Benoit Jacob [:bjacob] (mostly away) Assignee
	Description • 11 years ago

      No description provided.

	Kelsey Gilbert [:jgilbert]
	Comment 1 • 11 years ago

Comment on attachment 814176 [details] [diff] [review]
patch

Review of attachment 814176 [details] [diff] [review]:
-----------------------------------------------------------------

Great.

	u480271
	Comment 2 • 11 years ago

I have a patch, in limbo, that removes the prefixed extensions. Should we finalize that?

	Benoit Jacob [:bjacob] (mostly away) Assignee
	Comment 3 • 11 years ago

(In reply to Dan Glastonbury :djg :kamidphish from comment #2)
> I have a patch, in limbo, that removes the prefixed extensions. Should we
> finalize that?

Yes; the question is the timing. How about landing the present patch asap, and keeping that for one or two release cycles, and then (so maybe Gecko 29) land your patch that removes prefixed extensions? Looking at these 5 extensions, the biggie there is the S3TC extension. It's possible that some content out there is relying on it. But if Jeff or Vlad feel that we can drop them immediately, then sure, that's all the better.

	Benoit Jacob [:bjacob] (mostly away) Assignee
	Comment 4 • 11 years ago

https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/c4693dd2e897

	Ryan VanderMeulen [:RyanVM]
	Comment 5 • 11 years ago

https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/c4693dd2e897

	Kohei Yoshino [:kohei]
	Comment 6 • 11 years ago

https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/WebGL/Using_Extensions
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/27/Site_Compatibility