[META] Implement CSS container queries
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, enhancement)
Tracking
()
People
(Reporter: sebo, Unassigned)
References
(Depends on 17 open bugs, Blocks 10 open bugs, )
Details
(4 keywords)
This bug is a meta-bug for the implementation of CSS container queries introduced in CSS Containment Module Level 3.
Sebastian
Updated•2 years ago
|
FWIW, Chromium 106 and Safari 16 (both released last month) have full support, according to caniuse: https://caniuse.com/css-container-queries
Reporter | ||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Updated•2 years ago
|
Comment 3•1 year ago
|
||
Hi is there an update on this? I've tried loading in Firefox 108.0.1 and Firefox developer edition 109.0b8 and have been unsuccessful in seeing container queries working. The same websites works fine in chrome and IE.
Reporter | ||
Comment 4•1 year ago
|
||
The implementation of container queries is happening behind the preference layout.css.container-queries.enabled
, which you can enable via about:config
. That flag is also enabled by default on Firefox Nightly (currently 110.0a1).
Note that this is a meta-issue. The actual implementation happens in the bugs linked to under the "Depends on" label. You can also have a look at the dependency tree.
Sebastian
Comment 5•1 year ago
|
||
Thank you Sebastian that has been very helpful!
Is there plans to add this by default to future Firefox browsers? Also do you know if there is a thread or release documentation detailing these plans?
Thanks!
Reporter | ||
Comment 6•1 year ago
|
||
(In reply to cassiemagee23 from comment #5)
Is there plans to add this by default to future Firefox browsers?
The implementation of the feature is actively been worked on, so yes.
Also do you know if there is a thread or release documentation detailing these plans?
Normally, the people working on a new feature post a note in the mozilla.dev.platform group outlining an "Intent to implement" and later an "Intent to ship". Though that didn't happen for container queries, yet, as far as I can see.
Emilio, shouldn't at least the implementation be annouced in the group? And should a bug be created for shipping this feature?
Sebastian
Updated•1 year ago
|
Comment 7•1 year ago
|
||
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•1 year ago
|
Updated•10 months ago
|
Description
•