Support -webkit-image-set()
Categories
(Core :: Layout: Images, Video, and HTML Frames, enhancement)
Tracking
()
| Tracking | Status | |
|---|---|---|
| firefox90 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: jsnkuhn, Assigned: emilio)
References
Details
(Keywords: dev-doc-complete)
Attachments
(1 file)
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:88.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/88.0
Steps to reproduce:
existing -webkit-image-set() property values are ignored
Actual results:
Firefox skips code with the value -webkit-image-set().
Expected results:
adding support for -webkit-image-set() could retroactively cover 9 years of 2x resolution compatible web page code.
|
||
Comment 1•4 years ago
|
||
As pointed out by Tom and Karl in bug 1107646, -webkit-image-set() is used often without the unprefixed version, so for compatibility's sake the prefixed version should be implemented.
At the same time, a warning should be logged to the console to encourage the use of the unprefixed version when only the prefixed one is used.
Sebastian
|
||
Comment 2•4 years ago
|
||
The Bugbug bot thinks this bug should belong to the 'Core::ImageLib' component, and is moving the bug to that component. Please revert this change in case you think the bot is wrong.
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 3•4 years ago
|
||
The webkit syntax is an strict subset of the modern one, so this should
be doable, and is the simplest.
If my reading of the WebKit code is correct it should also be the way
WebKit deals with this (except they restrict -webkit-image-set() syntax
artificially).
|
||
Updated•4 years ago
|
|
||
Comment 6•4 years ago
|
||
| bugherder | ||
|
||
Comment 8•4 years ago
|
||
I've added a note to the docs, added a note to BCD, and mentioned in release notes.
Description
•