Closed
Bug 1511965
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 3 years ago
Extra symbols in slider checkboxes for playtech.ro website GDPR section
Categories
(Web Compatibility :: Site Reports, defect, P5)
Web Compatibility
Site Reports
Tracking
(firefox-esr60 wontfix, firefox63 wontfix, firefox64 wontfix, firefox65 wontfix)
People
(Reporter: cfogel, Unassigned)
References
()
Details
Attachments
(1 file)
256.53 KB,
image/png
|
Details |
[Affected versions]: - 45.3.0, 32.0a1, 64.0, 65.0a1(2018-12-03) [Affected platforms]: - win10x64/32, Ubuntu16.04, macOS 10.14 [Steps to reproduce]: 1. Access https://playtech.ro/stiri/cum-incalzesti-automobilul-masina-ami-repede-sfat-3267 2. Click on the [Mai multe optiuni] button [Expected result]: - The slider checkboxes are properly displayed; [Actual result]: - Extra symbols inside the checkbox; [Regression range]: - not a regression; [Additional notes]: - attached screenshot with the issue; - probably just an issue with the website/font; - while IE does not display anything, Chrome and Firefox do display the checkbox; Firefox browsers are displaying extra symbols inside;
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
Not a Firefox bug. The site is inserting Private Use codepoints in there (U+F00C, U+F00D) via CSS rules such as #strawberry-cookiebar .slider-checkbox input:checked + .label::before { background-color: #1877c1; content: "\f00c"; padding-left: 6px; } As U+F00C is a PUA codepoint, it will only display as intended if the appropriate font is applied. The site has CSS that intends to apply FontAwesome to this: #strawberry-cookiebar .slider-checkbox .label::before { content: "\f00d"; color: #fff; box-sizing: border-box; font-family: 'FontAwesome', sans-serif; /* ...etc... */ } but AFAICS it fails to provide FontAwesome as a web font anywhere. So it'll only work if the user happens to have FontAwesome installed locally; without this, we display a missing-glyph "hexbox", while Chrome just shows a "tofu" (undefined-glyph) box from whatever the default font happens to be. So the "fix" is for the site to set up the proper webfont resource if they want to use FontAwesome PUA codepoints. Or, better, remove the (attempted) use of these glyphs altogether; AFAICS they don't seem necessary. --> Moving to Tech Evangelism.
Component: Layout: Text and Fonts → Desktop
Product: Core → Tech Evangelism
Assignee | ||
Updated•5 years ago
|
Product: Tech Evangelism → Web Compatibility
Updated•5 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P5
Comment 2•3 years ago
|
||
The layout has changed and the issue no longer occurs.
https://prnt.sc/xre2zw
Tested with:
Browser / Version: Firefox Nightly 87.0a1 (2021-01-27)
Operating System: Windows 10 Pro
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 3 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Updated•2 years ago
|
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•