Closed
Bug 1441019
Opened 6 years ago
Closed 6 years ago
Move to Sphinx automatic JSDoc generation
Categories
(Remote Protocol :: Marionette, enhancement, P1)
Tracking
(firefox60 fixed)
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla60
Tracking | Status | |
---|---|---|
firefox60 | --- | fixed |
People
(Reporter: ato, Assigned: ato)
Details
Attachments
(12 files)
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
gps
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
59 bytes,
text/x-review-board-request
|
whimboo
:
review+
|
Details |
Sphinx now supports embedding jsdoc documentation, and instead of statically generating testing/marionette/doc/api manually we can hook into that and have the documentation automatically generated on TC, and published directly to http://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/.
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → ato
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•6 years ago
|
||
try: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=2468a099357963f9254f869bca5db42a29de4f38
Comment 2•6 years ago
|
||
Hurray! Does it mean we finally get rid of the generated HTML files in-tree? That is wonderful!
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Assignee | ||
Comment 15•6 years ago
|
||
The attached patches remove the statically generated documentation and sets up the integration with sphinx-js. They also make a start at converting some HTML-flavoured JSDocs into RST, which apparently is required if we are to publish with Sphinx. I don’t particularly like the extra churn this causes, but I think there is inherent value in being published on http://firefox-source-docs.mozilla.org/ that perhaps makes it worth it.
Assignee | ||
Updated•6 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P1
Comment 16•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953952 [details] Bug 1441019 - Remove pre-generated Marionette API docs. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223094/#review229194
Attachment #8953952 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 17•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953953 [details] Bug 1441019 - Remove jsdoc config. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223096/#review229196
Attachment #8953953 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 18•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953957 [details] Bug 1441019 - Add testing/marionette to js_source_path. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223104/#review229198 Sure.
Attachment #8953957 -
Flags: review+
Comment 19•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953954 [details] Bug 1441019 - Remove "./mach marionette doc" command. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223098/#review229200 ::: commit-message-c16a6:3 (Diff revision 1) > +Bug 1441019 - Remove "./mach marionette test" command. r?whimboo > + > +This removes the "./mach marionette test" command in favour of the You mean `./mach marionette doc` here, right?
Attachment #8953954 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 20•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953955 [details] Bug 1441019 - Remove duplicate namespace declaration. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223100/#review229202 Maybe mention that this is for event.js.
Attachment #8953955 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 21•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953956 [details] Bug 1441019 - Differentiate WorkerDebuggerTransport implementations. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223102/#review229206
Attachment #8953956 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 22•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953958 [details] Bug 1441019 - Add jsautodoc indices. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223106/#review229210 Please fill-in at least the basics for cookie.rst.
Attachment #8953958 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 23•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953959 [details] Bug 1441019 - Migrate cookie module docs to RST. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223108/#review229212
Attachment #8953959 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 24•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953960 [details] Bug 1441019 - Document Marionette error module. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223110/#review229218
Attachment #8953960 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 25•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953961 [details] Bug 1441019 - Migrate dom module docs to RST. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223112/#review229220 ::: testing/marionette/doc/internals/dom.rst (Diff revision 1) > dom module > ========== > > -ContentEventObserverService > ---------------------------- Better to kill those lines in the initial patch. ::: testing/marionette/dom.js:13 (Diff revision 1) > "ContentEventObserverService", > "WebElementEventTarget", > ]; > > /** > - * The {@link EventTarget} for web elements can be used to observe DOM > + * The ``EventTarget`` for web elements can be used to observe DOM Does that render as link, or do we have to keep something like :js:property:`EventTarget`? ::: testing/marionette/dom.js:22 (Diff revision 1) > - * to listen for top-level <code>window</code> global events. > + * to listen for top-level ``window`` global events. > * > - * It needs to be backed by a {@link ContentEventObserverService} in a > - * content frame script. > + * It needs to be backed by a :js:class:`ContentEventObserverService` > + * in a content frame script. > * > - * Usage: > + * Usage:: Why a double-colon? ::: testing/marionette/dom.js (Diff revision 1) > - * It needs to be backed by a {@link ContentEventObserverService} in a > - * content frame script. > + * It needs to be backed by a :js:class:`ContentEventObserverService` > + * in a content frame script. > * > - * Usage: > + * Usage:: > * > - * <pre><code> So we don't have to instruct sphinx-js to render something as code?
Attachment #8953961 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review-reply |
Comment on attachment 8953961 [details] Bug 1441019 - Migrate dom module docs to RST. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223112/#review229220 > Does that render as link, or do we have to keep something like :js:property:`EventTarget`? It will just render as monospace. The JSDoc link from before never lead anywhere because the EventTarget WebIDL isn’t defined. > Why a double-colon? This is RST syntax for pre-formatted monospace stuff, like code examples. > So we don't have to instruct sphinx-js to render something as code? Implied by the double colon.
Comment 27•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953962 [details] Bug 1441019 - Migrate sync module docs to RST. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223114/#review229224 ::: testing/marionette/doc/internals/sync.rst:4 (Diff revision 1) > sync module > =========== > > +Provides an assortment of synchronisation primitives. Best to already add this to the initial patch. ::: testing/marionette/sync.js (Diff revision 1) > + * The passed value to ``reject`` will also be returned to the caller > + * once the wait has expired. > + * > + * Usage:: > * > - * <pre><code> Same question regarding code examples as in the other commit. ::: testing/marionette/sync.js:118 (Diff revision 1) > /** > - * The <code>TimedPromise</code> object represents the timed, eventual > - * completion (or failure) of an asynchronous operation, and its > + * Represents the timed, eventual completion (or failure) of an > + * asynchronous operation, and its resulting value. > - * resulting value. > * > - * In contrast to a regular {@link Promise}, it times out after > + * In contrast to a regular promise, it times out after ``timeout``. `Promise` please.
Attachment #8953962 -
Flags: review?(hskupin)
Comment 28•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953963 [details] Bug 1441019 - Add overviews and links to new API docs. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223116/#review229256 ::: testing/marionette/doc/index.rst:54 (Diff revision 1) > `Contributing to Marionette`_ > NewContributors.md > Debugging.md > PythonTests.md > SeleniumAtoms.md > + internals/index Internals doesn't say that much, but not sure if there is something better.
Attachment #8953963 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review-reply |
Comment on attachment 8953962 [details] Bug 1441019 - Migrate sync module docs to RST. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223114/#review229224 > Same question regarding code examples as in the other commit. Double colon will start a code section.
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Comment hidden (mozreview-request) |
Updated•6 years ago
|
Attachment #8953957 -
Flags: review?(core-build-config-reviews) → review?(gps)
Comment 42•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953957 [details] Bug 1441019 - Add testing/marionette to js_source_path. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223104/#review229304 We should really get JS docs support in moz.build files...
Attachment #8953957 -
Flags: review?(gps) → review+
Comment 43•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953962 [details] Bug 1441019 - Migrate sync module docs to RST. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223114/#review229462
Attachment #8953962 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 44•6 years ago
|
||
mozreview-review |
Comment on attachment 8953961 [details] Bug 1441019 - Migrate dom module docs to RST. https://reviewboard.mozilla.org/r/223112/#review229464
Attachment #8953961 -
Flags: review?(hskupin) → review+
Comment 45•6 years ago
|
||
Pushed by atolfsen@mozilla.com: https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/64aac0ce028b Remove pre-generated Marionette API docs. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/2148942fab87 Remove jsdoc config. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/e490cf5bb284 Remove "./mach marionette doc" command. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/7ec2b7ddb765 Remove duplicate namespace declaration. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/bcf02942d86e Differentiate WorkerDebuggerTransport implementations. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/bc74d07ad0da Add testing/marionette to js_source_path. r=gps,nalexander https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/af130eb9481f Add jsautodoc indices. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/0995940608cf Migrate cookie module docs to RST. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/266b7514fc1f Document Marionette error module. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/ffbc1e20455e Migrate dom module docs to RST. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/00b77f68b9fb Migrate sync module docs to RST. r=whimboo https://hg.mozilla.org/integration/autoland/rev/8e612e57fc49 Add overviews and links to new API docs. r=whimboo
Comment 46•6 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/64aac0ce028b https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/2148942fab87 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/e490cf5bb284 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/7ec2b7ddb765 https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bcf02942d86e https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/bc74d07ad0da https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/af130eb9481f https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/0995940608cf https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/266b7514fc1f https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/ffbc1e20455e https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/00b77f68b9fb https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/8e612e57fc49
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 6 years ago
status-firefox60:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla60
Updated•1 year ago
|
Product: Testing → Remote Protocol
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•