Closed
Bug 1207068
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
Implement ExtendableMessageEvent interface
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Core & HTML, defect)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
FIXED
mozilla45
People
(Reporter: dlee, Assigned: dlee)
References
Details
(Keywords: dev-doc-complete)
Attachments
(1 file)
22.57 KB,
patch
|
dlee
:
review+
ritu
:
approval-mozilla-aurora+
|
Details | Diff | Splinter Review |
ServiceWorker should use extendableMessageEvent interface instead of MessageEvent according to https://slightlyoff.github.io/ServiceWorker/spec/service_worker/index.html#extendablemessage-event-interface
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dlee
Blocks: ServiceWorkers-B2G
Updated•9 years ago
|
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee | ||
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 2•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8685302 [details] [diff] [review] Implement ExtendableMessageEvent Set r+ because this patch is already reviewed in bug 1143717 Comment 21.
Attachment #8685302 -
Flags: review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
try result: https://treeherder.mozilla.org/#/jobs?repo=try&revision=1aa3a138c450
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: checkin-needed
Comment 5•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder |
https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/9184d15b52be
Status: ASSIGNED → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
status-firefox45:
--- → fixed
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Target Milestone: --- → mozilla45
Comment 6•9 years ago
|
||
Is this going to be backported to Firefox 44?
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(overholt)
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Do we need it in 44?
Flags: needinfo?(overholt)
Flags: needinfo?(ehsan)
Flags: needinfo?(dlee)
Flags: needinfo?(catalin.badea392)
Flags: needinfo?(bkelly)
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
(For reference, I'm asking because of this: https://github.com/mozilla/serviceworker-cookbook/pull/140#discussion_r46159137)
Comment 9•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8685302 [details] [diff] [review] Implement ExtendableMessageEvent Approval Request Comment [Feature/regressing bug #]: Service workers [User impact if declined]: We need this to maintain compatibility with chrome in service workers. Its already been noticed by devs so we should uplift it. [Describe test coverage new/current, TreeHerder]: Tests included. [Risks and why]: Minimal. Only affects service workers. [String/UUID change made/needed]: None.
Flags: needinfo?(bkelly)
Attachment #8685302 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora?
Updated•9 years ago
|
status-firefox43:
--- → wontfix
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(ehsan)
Flags: needinfo?(dlee)
Flags: needinfo?(catalin.badea392)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
Comment on attachment 8685302 [details] [diff] [review] Implement ExtendableMessageEvent SW is planned for 44 and this fix has baked on Nightly for almost ~4 weeks. Let's uplift to Aurora44.
Attachment #8685302 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-aurora? → approval-mozilla-aurora+
Comment 11•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-aurora/rev/3f7cc875e92e
Comment 12•9 years ago
|
||
bugherder uplift |
https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g44_v2_5/rev/3f7cc875e92e
status-b2g-v2.5:
--- → fixed
Comment 13•9 years ago
|
||
I've documented this here (see also subpages): https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/ExtendableMessageEvent The message event itself is covered here: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/Events/message_%28ServiceWorker%29 And a note has been added to the 44 release notes: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/Firefox/Releases/44#Service_Workers Let me know if thus makes sense, or if I have got confused here. Thanks!
Keywords: dev-doc-needed → dev-doc-complete
Updated•5 years ago
|
Component: DOM → DOM: Core & HTML
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•