Closed
Bug 1139331
Opened 9 years ago
Closed 9 years ago
[nexus-5-l][FOTA] error while making partial/update.zip
Categories
(Firefox OS Graveyard :: General, defect)
Tracking
(blocking-b2g:2.5+, b2g-v2.2 fixed, b2g-master fixed)
People
(Reporter: contact, Assigned: etsai)
References
Details
(Keywords: qablocker)
Attachments
(5 files, 6 obsolete files)
6.19 KB,
text/plain
|
Details | |
56.14 KB,
text/x-python
|
Details | |
49 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
gsvelto
:
review+
kkuo
:
approval-mozilla-b2g37+
|
Details | Review |
54 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
gsvelto
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
43 bytes,
text/x-github-pull-request
|
gsvelto
:
review+
|
Details | Review |
User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:36.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/36.0 Build ID: 20150224222119 Steps to reproduce: BRANCH='master' ./config.sh 'nexus-5-l' ./build.sh &> build.txt ./build.sh gecko-update-fota &> fota.txt Actual results: mkdir -p `dirname out/target/product/hammerhead/fota/partial/update.zip` || true Traceback (most recent call last): File "tools/update-tools/build-flash-fota.py", line 134, in <module> main() File "tools/update-tools/build-flash-fota.py", line 128, in main build_flash_fota(parser.parse_args()) File "tools/update-tools/build-flash-fota.py", line 58, in build_flash_fota output_zip, update_bin) File "/srv/firefoxos/tests/source/tools/update-tools/update_tools.py", line 1036, in build_flash_fota flash_zip.write_recursive(system_dir, "system", filter=self.zip_filter) File "/srv/firefoxos/tests/source/tools/update-tools/update_tools.py", line 395, in write_recursive if not filter or filter(file_path, relpath): File "/srv/firefoxos/tests/source/tools/update-tools/update_tools.py", line 1016, in zip_filter Item.Get(relpath, dir=os.path.isdir(path)) AttributeError: class Item has no attribute 'Get' make: *** [out/target/product/hammerhead/fota/partial/update.zip] Error 1 Expected results: Generate out/target/product/hammerhead/fota/partial/update.zip With : [ BRANCH='master' ./config.sh 'nexus-5' ], update.zip is generated correctly.
[Blocking Requested - why for this release]:
blocking-b2g: --- → 3.0?
OS: All → Linux
Hardware: All → x86_64
I reproduce this error running ./build.sh gecko-update-fota on nexus-5-l on aurora and nightly branch. These builds worked before on nexus-5 without problem.
Comment 3•9 years ago
|
||
I have no idea wh
Comment 4•9 years ago
|
||
I have no idea why this fails. You will have to debug it on your own :( Marshall wrote this some times ago, maybe he has an idea
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(marshall)
I tried with this patch https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/B2G/commit/1d9d6f20db55e9405053072a9353d82d18bffdbc thanks to gerard-majax, I had this error building fota for aurora branch: http://pastebin.com/WRBgX33U
Comment 7•9 years ago
|
||
Right, maybe the bits from bug 1130288 weren't landed on all the branches used by the Nexus 5 build?
Flags: needinfo?(gsvelto)
Comment 8•9 years ago
|
||
It's been a while since I maintained this code, and I've never tried to build for the Nexus 5.. unsure I can be of immediate help here. Maybe the API we import from releasetools has changed somehow? You can check the python code in $B2G/build/tools/releasetools/ota_from_target_files to see if Item.Get actually exists there..
Flags: needinfo?(marshall)
(In reply to Marshall Culpepper [:marshall_law] from comment #8) > It's been a while since I maintained this code, and I've never tried to > build for the Nexus 5.. unsure I can be of immediate help here. > > Maybe the API we import from releasetools has changed somehow? You can check > the python code in $B2G/build/tools/releasetools/ota_from_target_files to > see if Item.Get actually exists there.. There is no "Item.Get" in $B2G/build/tools/releasetools/ota_from_target_files.
Hrm. It looks like ItemSet has the get; the class Item doesn't have a get. This affects N5-L for master and v2.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED → NEW
Ever confirmed: true
This blocks creating FOTA and FOTA testing.
Keywords: qablocker
Flags: needinfo?(marshall)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(kkuo)
Comment 16•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #15) > I'm also hitting this on Flame KK while hacking bug 1136638 Or not ..., I did a mistake.
No longer blocks: 1136638
Comment 17•9 years ago
|
||
I can found similar error. --- File "/home/workspace/B2G/tools/update-tools/update_tools.py", line 1016, in zip_filter Item.Get(relpath, dir=os.path.isdir(path)) AttributeError: class Item has no attribute 'Get I notice that in B2G/tools/releasetools/ota_from_target_files, Class Item is re-factored and ItemSet is added. So I think update_tools.py need to be updated accordingly.
Flags: needinfo?(kli)
Comment 18•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kai-Zhen Li [:kli][:seinlin] from comment #17) > So I think update_tools.py need to be updated accordingly. Sounds about right; I didn't realize we had two pieces of code doing the same thing.
Updated•9 years ago
|
blocking-b2g: 3.0? → 3.0+
Comment 20•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kai-Zhen Li [:kli][:seinlin] from comment #17) > I can found similar error. > --- > File "/home/workspace/B2G/tools/update-tools/update_tools.py", line 1016, > in zip_filter > Item.Get(relpath, dir=os.path.isdir(path)) > AttributeError: class Item has no attribute 'Get > > > I notice that in B2G/tools/releasetools/ota_from_target_files, Class Item is > re-factored and ItemSet is added. > > So I think update_tools.py need to be updated accordingly. :kli, can you help with resolving this?
Flags: needinfo?(kli)
Comment 21•9 years ago
|
||
Bhavana, I can take this but my bandwidth is occupied. I am not sure if I can looking into it before mid April. If someone who familiar with python script can help, please feel free to take this.
Assignee: nobody → kli
Flags: needinfo?(kli)
Comment 22•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Gabriele Svelto [:gsvelto] [on PTO until the 7th of April] from comment #18) > > Sounds about right; I didn't realize we had two pieces of code doing the > same thing. I think it is not two pieces of code doing the same thing. It is more likely, the APIs (object/functions) in platform_build are changed, the caller in update_tools need to be updated accordingly.
Comment 24•9 years ago
|
||
There is some progress by Eric Tsai, I think we can get a solution in next week.
Flags: needinfo?(kli)
Assignee | ||
Comment 25•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 26•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 27•9 years ago
|
||
Comment 28•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Eric Tsai from comment #27) > Created attachment 8590688 [details] [review] > build-flash-fota patch and update_tools_l.py Copy/pasting update_tools and having to maintain a L-specific version ? I'm not very sure this is the best we can do :(
Assignee | ||
Comment 29•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8590684 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8590708 -
Attachment description: Fix Android.mk to wrong pull request → Fix Android.mk, add PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION
Comment 30•9 years ago
|
||
Eric, You already get some progress. Could you take this bug? Thanks!
Assignee | ||
Comment 31•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 32•9 years ago
|
||
I've made another patch, PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION detection in update_tools.py only. No modification in build-flash-fota.py and extra update_tools_l.py.
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8590688 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Assignee: kli → etsai
Assignee | ||
Comment 33•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8590679 [details] [review] ota_from_target_files for l https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/platform_build/pull/113
Assignee | ||
Comment 34•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8590708 [details] [review] Fix Android.mk, add PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gonk-misc/pull/227
Assignee | ||
Comment 35•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8591512 [details] [review] update_tools.py with PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION detection :gsvelto, I made some changes to update_tools.py for making nexus-5-l update.zip. Could you help to review it?
Attachment #8591512 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8590679 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 36•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8590708 [details] [review] Fix Android.mk, add PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gonk-misc/pull/227
Assignee | ||
Comment 37•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8590708 [details] [review] Fix Android.mk, add PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gonk-misc/pull/227
Assignee | ||
Comment 38•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8590708 [details] [review] Fix Android.mk, add PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gonk-misc/pull/227
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8590708 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Assignee | ||
Comment 39•9 years ago
|
||
Assignee | ||
Comment 40•9 years ago
|
||
Modify ota_from_target_files for nexus-5-l
Attachment #8592686 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8592602 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto)
Comment 41•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8592686 [details] [review] ota_from_target_files for l LGTM.
Attachment #8592686 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto) → review+
Comment 42•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8592602 [details] [review] gonk-misc/Android.mk, add PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION LGTM.
Attachment #8592602 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto) → review+
Comment 43•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8591512 [details] [review] update_tools.py with PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION detection This is OK too in principle but the code duplication really hurts my eyes. Couldn't you replace all the checks with a single helper that returns the right object and call the relevant methods on that instead? Something like: def GetItemOrSet(obj) if int(os.environ['PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION']) >= 21: return obj.itemset; else: return Item; Then use it: GetItemOrSet(self).GetMetadata(...) GetItemOrSet(self).Get(...) ...
Attachment #8591512 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto)
Assignee | ||
Comment 44•9 years ago
|
||
Attachment #8591512 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8594671 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto)
Comment 45•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8594671 [details] [review] update_tools.py with PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION detection and global helper function LGTM, just one nit: since GetItemOrItemset() is used only in the FlashFotaBuilder class you can make it a member of that class and get rid of the obj parameter using self directly instead. I hadn't realized that immediately in my previous review otherwise I would have recommended it right away.
Attachment #8594671 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto) → review+
Assignee | ||
Comment 46•9 years ago
|
||
:gsvelto If make GetItemOrItemset as a member function, I would like to create itemset after import_releasetools called in FlashFotaBuilder.__init__ , reduce the if statement for hasattr in GetItemOrItemset.
Assignee | ||
Comment 47•9 years ago
|
||
By :gsvelto 's comment, move the helper function to member function
Attachment #8594671 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
Attachment #8595157 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto)
Comment 48•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8595157 [details] [review] update_tools.py with PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION detection in member helper function LGTM, thanks!
Attachment #8595157 -
Flags: review?(gsvelto) → review+
Blocks: 1136638
Blocks: 1130288
I guess I shouldn't say that they block. the bugs are related. removing the bugs from the blocking.
Comment 50•9 years ago
|
||
https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/B2G/commit/aca9cc8b270afa524b5b4619d711f79d8cb895cf https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gonk-misc/commit/d3868ff4bb3a4b81382795e2784258c210fe6cb8 https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/platform_build/commit/61e82f99bb8bc78d52b5717e9a2481ec7267fa33
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 9 years ago
Resolution: --- → FIXED
Assignee | ||
Comment 51•9 years ago
|
||
Comment on attachment 8592602 [details] [review] gonk-misc/Android.mk, add PLATFORM_SDK_VERSION gonk-misc/Android.mk PR for branch v2.2 NOTE: Please see https://wiki.mozilla.org/Release_Management/B2G_Landing to better understand the B2G approval process and landings. [Approval Request Comment] Bug caused by (feature/regressing bug #): this bug, 1139331 User impact if declined: Developer is unable to build update package for branch < master Testing completed: Locally verified on master branch, successfully generate update package Risk to taking this patch (and alternatives if risky): Low, easy to backout String or UUID changes made by this patch: none
Attachment #8592602 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g37?
Updated•9 years ago
|
Attachment #8592602 -
Flags: approval-mozilla-b2g37? → approval-mozilla-b2g37+
Comment 52•9 years ago
|
||
v2.2: https://github.com/mozilla-b2g/gonk-misc/commit/3a6886700cd20ed46b1d093e81483c63b6af27cb
Comment 53•9 years ago
|
||
Hi Ben, Since this bug is fixed, I try to perform OTA, but it's failed. According to the logs, there is no build returned from xml. This might need you to fix. I/Gecko ( 195): *** AUS:SVC Checker:checkForUpdates - sending request to: https://aus4.mozilla.org/update/3/B2G/37.0/20150419162502/hammerhead/en-US/nightly-b2g37/Boot2Gecko%202.2.0.0-prerelease%20(SDK%2022)/default/default/update.xml?force=1 I/GeckoConsole( 195): AUS:SVC Checker:checkForUpdates - sending request to: https://aus4.mozilla.org/update/3/B2G/37.0/20150419162502/hammerhead/en-US/nightly-b2g37/Boot2Gecko%202.2.0.0-prerelease%20(SDK%2022)/default/default/update.xml?force=1 I/Gecko ( 195): *** AUS:SVC Checker:onLoad - request completed downloading document I/GeckoConsole( 195): AUS:SVC Checker:onLoad - request completed downloading document I/Gecko ( 195): *** AUS:SVC Checker:onLoad - number of updates available: 0 I/GeckoConsole( 195): AUS:SVC Checker:onLoad - number of updates available: 0
Flags: needinfo?(bhearsum)
Comment 54•9 years ago
|
||
I don't see any metadata on the update server for "hammerhead", so I'm not surprised. I've never heard of these builds, and my team doesn't do b2g builds anymore...whomever is doing these builds needs to be uploading metadata to the update server. Eric/Kai-Zhen, it seems like these are builds that you folks are doing. Do you need a hand figuring out how to get updates working?
Flags: needinfo?(kli)
Flags: needinfo?(etsai)
Flags: needinfo?(bhearsum)
Comment 55•9 years ago
|
||
Ben build of hammerhead (neux-5) is created in bug 1111890. In build config, in this build 'releng-private-updates.py' is used [1]. In releng-private-updates.py, default actions include submit-to-balrog [2]. But I didn't upload build to aus4, and I have no idea what's wrong with this. Could you give me some suggestion, how can we upload the build to aus4 correctly? I'll try to submit a patch to fix this. Thanks! [1] http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/file/2bd0fd3b12e3/mozilla/b2g_config.py#l651 [2] http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/file/c3114f35e5ec/configs/b2g/releng-private-updates.py#l16
Flags: needinfo?(kli) → needinfo?(bhearsum)
Comment 56•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Kai-Zhen Li [:kli][:seinlin] from comment #55) > Ben build of hammerhead (neux-5) is created in bug 1111890. In build config, > in this build 'releng-private-updates.py' is used [1]. In > releng-private-updates.py, default actions include submit-to-balrog [2]. But > I didn't upload build to aus4, and I have no idea what's wrong with this. > Could you give me some suggestion, how can we upload the build to aus4 > correctly? I'll try to submit a patch to fix this. Thanks! > > [1] > http://hg.mozilla.org/build/buildbot-configs/file/2bd0fd3b12e3/mozilla/ > b2g_config.py#l651 > [2] > http://hg.mozilla.org/build/mozharness/file/c3114f35e5ec/configs/b2g/releng- > private-updates.py#l16 I don't think we've ever got you set-up with the access you need to submit updates to that server, so I'm not surprised that this isn't working. You probably need credentials, netflows, and maybe some tweaks to your mozharness configs.
Flags: needinfo?(bhearsum)
Comment 57•9 years ago
|
||
Chris, Per comment 55, do you have any idea why nexus5-l build is not uploaded to aus4.mozilla.org? Do you have any suggestion? May be we can file a new bug to finish this. Thanks!
Flags: needinfo?(catlee)
Assignee | ||
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(etsai)
Comment 58•9 years ago
|
||
Hi Gerry, Could we test this locally, just to make sure the 2.2->2.2 update channel is working fine, thank you.
Flags: needinfo?(gchang)
Comment 59•9 years ago
|
||
I create a local OTA package in my local OTA server and use below build to upgrade to my package. The upgrade works well. Build ID 20150419162502 Gaia Revision c15a2b6d3a783813959c2b3bffd2a131f4270b9e Gaia Date 2015-04-17 17:49:32 Gecko Revision https://hg.mozilla.org/releases/mozilla-b2g37_v2_2/rev/cc02ee38b252 Gecko Version 37.0 Device Name hammerhead Firmware(Release) 5.1 local build information: Build ID 20150430112012 Gaia Revision 1b7aa7e60788668ed09abf76022dfa231dbe88d4 Gaia Date 2015-04-28 19:36:06 Gecko Revision 99c413dedbdc943230dad88e7da48d6081fd8d13 Gecko Version 37.0 Device Name hammerhead Firmware(Release) 5.1 Also put some logs here for reference: I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Checker:getUpdateURL - update URL: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/nexus-ota.xml?force=1 I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Checker:onLoad - number of updates available: 1 I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Checker:onLoad - number of updates available: 1 I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Creating UpdateService ... I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:downloadUpdate - downloading from http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50 to /storage/emulated/legacy/updates/0/update.mar I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:downloadUpdate - downloading from http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50 to /storage/emulated/legacy/updates/0/update.mar I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:onStartRequest - original URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50, final URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50 I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:onStartRequest - original URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50, final URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50 I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:onProgress - progress: 512/95031425 I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:onProgress - progress: 512/95031425 I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:onProgress - progress: 1324643/95031425 ... I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - original URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50, final URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50, status: 0 I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - original URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50, final URI spec: http://10.247.28.216/OTA/img/b2g-hammerhead-gecko-update.mar?build_id=20160708160201&version=50, status: 0 I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - status: 0, current fail: 0, max fail: 20, retryTimeout: 30000 I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - status: 0, current fail: 0, max fail: 20, retryTimeout: 30000 I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:_verifyDownload called I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:_verifyDownload called I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:_verifyDownload downloaded size == expected size. I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:_verifyDownload downloaded size == expected size. I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:_verifyDownload hashes match. I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:_verifyDownload hashes match. I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC getCanStageUpdates - able to stage updates because we'll use the service I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC getCanStageUpdates - able to stage updates because we'll use the service I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - setting state to: pending I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - setting state to: pending I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC getCanStageUpdates - able to stage updates because we'll use the service I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC getCanStageUpdates - able to stage updates because we'll use the service I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - attempting to stage update: Firefox 50 I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC Downloader:onStopRequest - attempting to stage update: Firefox 50 I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC readStatusFile - status: applied, path: /data/local/updates/0/update.status I/GeckoConsole( 202): AUS:SVC readStatusFile - status: applied, path: /data/local/updates/0/update.status I/Gecko ( 202): *** AUS:SVC UpdateManager:refreshUpdateStatus - Notifying observers that the update was staged. state: applied, status: applied
Flags: needinfo?(gchang)
Updated•9 years ago
|
QA Whiteboard: [COM=OTA]
Comment 60•9 years ago
|
||
I think this should be reworked: SDK version is already an argument that we are passing to the scripts (--sdk-version). So there is no need to rely on environment variable.
Flags: needinfo?(md.tsai)
Flags: needinfo?(gsvelto)
Flags: needinfo?(etsai)
Hi Gerry? Was that suppose to be FOTA or OTA? I think we need FOTA in order to update the gecko. We should be able to do full image flash now for kk, via : B2G_UPDATER=1 ./build.sh gecko-update-fota-fullimg Can you test this please if you have not?
Flags: needinfo?(gchang)
Assignee | ||
Comment 62•9 years ago
|
||
(In reply to Alexandre LISSY :gerard-majax from comment #60) > I think this should be reworked: SDK version is already an argument that we > are passing to the scripts (--sdk-version). So there is no need to rely on > environment variable. I'm ok with the rework.
Flags: needinfo?(md.tsai)
Flags: needinfo?(etsai)
Comment 63•9 years ago
|
||
Hi Naoki, In comment #59, I use OTA to test. So far, FOTA doesn't work on nexus 5. I've submitted another bug 1163956 for this.
Flags: needinfo?(gchang)
Comment 64•9 years ago
|
||
Already r+'d the relevant change in the other bug so clearing the NI :)
Flags: needinfo?(gsvelto)
Updated•9 years ago
|
Flags: needinfo?(catlee)
Updated•9 years ago
|
status-b2g-v2.5:
--- → fixed
Updated•9 years ago
|
status-b2g-v2.5:
fixed → ---
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•