Open
Bug 1106296
Opened 10 years ago
Updated 1 month ago
Update `:empty` to also match whitespace‑only elements (like `:-moz-only-whitespace`)
Categories
(Core :: CSS Parsing and Computation, enhancement)
Core
CSS Parsing and Computation
Tracking
()
ASSIGNED
People
(Reporter: sjw+bugzilla, Assigned: dshin)
References
(Blocks 2 open bugs, )
Details
(Keywords: dev-doc-needed, site-compat)
Attachments
(1 obsolete file)
We already have :-moz-only-whitespace and we should also support the standardized pseudo-class :blank. At the moment it's not sure, if :blank will be the final name.
Blocks: selectors-4
|
||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
Blocks: unprefix
Today the group resolved to drop :blank and change :empty to be like :blank, although I'm skeptical that this will be Web-compatible. We should do this after Blink does it, but I don't think it's worth risking Web compat on before they move first.
|
||
Updated•7 years ago
|
Keywords: site-compat
We should probably do this sooner, rather than later, as `:blank` is now documented on MDN with support for `:‑moz‑only‑whitespace` being documented in the browser compatibility table. https://developer.mozilla.org/docs/Web/CSS/:blank https://github.com/mdn/browser-compat-data/pull/2841 https://github.com/mdn/data/pull/298
See Also: → https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1967
Type: defect → enhancement
Summary: Support the standardized version of :-moz-only-whitespace (:blank) → Update `:empty` to also match whitespace‑only elements (like `:-moz-only-whitespace`)
|
||
Updated•2 years ago
|
Severity: normal → S3
|
Assignee | |
Comment 4•8 months ago
|
||
This merges -moz-only-whitespace, which had this behaviour already, into empty.
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
Assignee: nobody → dshin
Status: NEW → ASSIGNED
|
||
Comment 5•8 months ago
|
||
Looking through https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/1967, it's not clear to me that there's any firm agreement on this.... has there been recent discussion, beyond what's in that issue? What's the status in other browsers?
Flags: needinfo?(dshin)
|
|
Assignee | |
Comment 6•8 months ago
|
||
Hmm... you're right. Should've gone through all the link before trying to follow the spec.
No other browsers currently do this.
I'll shelve the change and contribute to that discussion.
Flags: needinfo?(dshin)
|
|
||
Updated•8 months ago
|
Attachment #9349583 -
Attachment is obsolete: true
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•