Ioana Chiorean Reporter
	Description • 10 years ago

This bug was filed from the Socorro interface and is 
report bp-00aa8e41-723b-443a-ab6d-34f352141114.

=============================================================
	libxul.so	mozilla::a11y::ProxyDestroyed(mozilla::a11y::ProxyAccessible*)	accessible/atk/AccessibleWrap.cpp
1	libxul.so	mozilla::a11y::ProxyAccessible::Shutdown()	accessible/ipc/ProxyAccessible.cpp
2	libxul.so	mozilla::a11y::ProxyAccessible::Shutdown()	accessible/ipc/ProxyAccessible.cpp
3	libxul.so	mozilla::a11y::ProxyAccessible::Shutdown()	accessible/ipc/ProxyAccessible.cpp
4	libxul.so	mozilla::a11y::DocAccessibleParent::RecvHideEvent(unsigned long const&)	accessible/ipc/DocAccessibleParent.cpp
5	libxul.so	mozilla::a11y::PDocAccessibleParent::OnMessageReceived(IPC::Message const&)	obj-firefox/ipc/ipdl/PDocAccessibleParent.cpp
6	libxul.so	mozilla::dom::PContentParent::OnMessageReceived(IPC::Message const&)	obj-firefox/ipc/ipdl/PContentParent.cpp
7	libxul.so	mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::DispatchAsyncMessage(IPC::Message const&)	ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp
8	libxul.so	mozilla::ipc::MessageChannel::OnMaybeDequeueOne()	ipc/glue/MessageChannel.cpp
9	libxul.so	MessageLoop::DeferOrRunPendingTask(MessageLoop::PendingTask const&)	ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc
10	libxul.so	MessageLoop::DoWork()	ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc
11	libxul.so	mozilla::ipc::DoWorkRunnable::Run()	ipc/glue/MessagePump.cpp
12	libxul.so	nsThread::ProcessNextEvent(bool, bool*)	xpcom/threads/nsThread.cpp
13	libxul.so	NS_ProcessNextEvent(nsIThread*, bool)	xpcom/glue/nsThreadUtils.cpp
14	libxul.so	mozilla::ipc::MessagePump::Run(base::MessagePump::Delegate*)	ipc/glue/MessagePump.cpp
15	libxul.so	MessageLoop::Run()	ipc/chromium/src/base/message_loop.cc
16	libxul.so	nsBaseAppShell::Run()	widget/nsBaseAppShell.cpp
17	libxul.so	nsAppStartup::Run()	toolkit/components/startup/nsAppStartup.cpp
18	libxul.so	XREMain::XRE_mainRun()	toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp
19	libxul.so	XREMain::XRE_main(int, char**, nsXREAppData const*)	toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp
20	libxul.so	XRE_main	toolkit/xre/nsAppRunner.cpp
21	firefox	do_main	browser/app/nsBrowserApp.cpp
22	firefox	main	browser/app/nsBrowserApp.cpp
Ø 23	libc-2.15.so	libc-2.15.so@0x2176c	
24	firefox	_init	
25	firefox	malloc_good_size	memory/build/replace_malloc.c
26	firefox	__libc_csu_fini	
27	firefox	malloc_good_size	memory/build/replace_malloc.c
28	firefox	_start

	:Gijs (he/him)
	Comment 1 • 10 years ago

This seems like something surkov would know about...

	alexander :surkov (:asurkov)
	Comment 2 • 10 years ago

that's rather Trevor ping

	David Bolter [:davidb] (NeedInfo me for attention)
	Comment 3 • 9 years ago

This has very low frequency but still seems to happen.
https://crash-stats.mozilla.com/report/index/08c85623-9ecc-4c69-87f3-9ba9e2150603

	David Bolter [:davidb] (NeedInfo me for attention)
	Comment 4 • 9 years ago

No crashes since buildid 20150719030219 (2015 07 19 ...)

	David Bolter [:davidb] (NeedInfo me for attention)
	Comment 5 • 9 years ago

(In reply to David Bolter [:davidb] from comment #4)
> No crashes since buildid 20150719030219 (2015 07 19 ...)

This is no longer the case.

BTW is bug 1187055 a DUPE?

	David Bolter [:davidb] (NeedInfo me for attention)
	Comment 6 • 9 years ago

Actually best to completely ignore my comment about 'no crashes since'... that was based on a bad assumption about crash-stats UI.

	David Bolter [:davidb] (NeedInfo me for attention)
	Comment 7 • 9 years ago

Pretty sure the Windows version of this (Bug 1187055) is fixed, so reverting platform field.

	Jim Mathies [:jimm]
	Comment 8 • 9 years ago

(In reply to David Bolter [:davidb] from comment #7)
> Pretty sure the Windows version of this (Bug 1187055) is fixed, so reverting
> platform field.

Yep, sorry. Didn't see that bug. Definitely fixed after 20150728030209.

	David Bolter [:davidb] (NeedInfo me for attention)
	Comment 9 • 9 years ago

From my novice examination of crash stats I don't think there have been Linux crashes for quite some time but I'm not sure I queried right. dmajor, can you double check?

	(Away)
	Comment 10 • 9 years ago

This hasn't been seen even once on Linux in as far as Socorro can go back (six months).

	David Bolter [:davidb] (NeedInfo me for attention)
	Comment 11 • 9 years ago

(In reply to David Major [:dmajor] from comment #10)
> This hasn't been seen even once on Linux in as far as Socorro can go back
> (six months).

Cool. I guess the comment 0 stack is the only one we know about. Let's reopen if it reappears.