Will Kahn-Greene [:willkg] ET needinfo? me Reporter
	Description • 10 years ago

django-cache-machine is poorly maintained in the sense that they never put out releases and doing the sorts of things maintainers should be doing for a properly maintained project.

Ricky pointed out that Input probably doesn't need django-cache-machine at all. Most of the "fetch" kinds of things pull from ES and not the db. We could easily write a mini-caching layer for the few things that pull from the db that actually need to be cached.

This bug covers researching removing django-cache-machine and examining whether it will create performance issues if we do.

	Will Kahn-Greene [:willkg] ET needinfo? me Reporter
	Comment 1 • 10 years ago

Jannis said they ditched it on MDN and haven't been happier.

I think that suggests we should just ditch it and then fix performance issues as they come up.

	Will Kahn-Greene [:willkg] ET needinfo? me Reporter
	Comment 2 • 9 years ago

Tossing this in the 2015q1 queue.

	Will Kahn-Greene [:willkg] ET needinfo? me Reporter
	Comment 3 • 9 years ago

Might as well ditch this before the Django upgrade to simplify things.

	Ricky Rosario [:rrosario, :r1cky] Assignee
	Comment 4 • 9 years ago

Gonna work on this todayish.

	Ricky Rosario [:rrosario, :r1cky] Assignee
	Comment 5 • 9 years ago

The pull request was here:
https://github.com/mozilla/fjord/pull/433

The commits that landed on master:
https://github.com/mozilla/fjord/commit/565e05d060fa8dffb896982502815405f9fdae8f
https://github.com/mozilla/fjord/commit/53d8043e12b57658417cdc4e15e3de1896ce2ce4
https://github.com/mozilla/fjord/commit/0a47fdc0dd8cd27c2d125dc2480aff1bb4a11f31

	Ricky Rosario [:rrosario, :r1cky] Assignee
	Comment 6 • 9 years ago

I think this was about 1pt.

	Ricky Rosario [:rrosario, :r1cky] Assignee
	Comment 7 • 9 years ago

willkg just deployed to prod.