Closed
Bug 1045899
Opened 11 years ago
Closed 4 years ago
Implement CSP 1.1 plugin-types directive
Categories
(Core :: DOM: Security, enhancement, P3)
Tracking
()
RESOLVED
INVALID
People
(Reporter: geekboy, Unassigned)
References
(Blocks 1 open bug, )
Details
(Whiteboard: [CSP 1.1], [domsecurity-backlog3])
Implement plugin-types directive for CSP that restricts what types of plugins can load on a page.
From the draft spec: "The plugin-types directive restricts the set of plugins that can be invoked by the protected resource by limiting the types of resources that can be embedded. ". See the URL for details.
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Priority: -- → P3
Updated•10 years ago
|
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
Reporter | ||
Updated•10 years ago
|
Assignee: sstamm → nobody
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [CSP 1.1] → [CSP 1.1], [domsecurity-backlog]
Comment 1•9 years ago
|
||
Note: since we're removing support for all plugins except Flash in FF52, and the current sandboxing status-quo is to not allow plugins at all, I'm not sure this is worthwhile. Should we consider WONTFIXing this or even removing this from CSP 1.1?
Updated•9 years ago
|
Whiteboard: [CSP 1.1], [domsecurity-backlog] → [CSP 1.1], [domsecurity-backlog3]
Comment 2•7 years ago
|
||
Web developers putting this out will get console messages on every page currently.
If you're not going to support that's okay, but can we at least suppress that?
Comment 3•6 years ago
|
||
Given https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/issues/394 and recent removal of typemustmatch I don't think we should implement this.
Chris, that request is probably best logged separately, but if Chrome also removes this the console messages might actually become warranted.
The next release of Firefox will remove plugin support. Is there any use case for this afterwards?
Comment 5•4 years ago
|
||
This has been removed from the spec now as well: https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-csp/pull/456
Keywords: dev-doc-needed
Updated•4 years ago
|
Status: NEW → RESOLVED
Closed: 4 years ago
Resolution: --- → INVALID
You need to log in
before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.
Description
•